Skip to content

An Illustrated History of the Snowdon Mountain Railway by Peter Johnson

By Peter Johnson

The Snowdon Mountain Railway is exclusive between Britain's railways, particularly actually a Swiss mountain rack-and-pinion railway translated to the grandeur of Snowdonia to ascend Wales' maximum top, Mount Snowdon. in-built 1895 via the Snowdon Mountain Tramroad & lodges corporation, it's always most sensible remembered for the tragic twist of fate that happened at the first day of public operation in 1896. It overcame that lousy occasion and has verified a well-earned position as the most well known vacationer railways in Wales. strange between Britain's passenger-carrying railways, the Snowdon Mountain Railway was once outfitted with no Parliamentary authority on deepest land, a scenario that limits the quantity of historic details to be had in public information. examine performed via railway historian Peter Johnson has exposed many new insights into the railway's interesting background. attractive surroundings and a different railway mix to make this a desirable ebook that may attract railway enthusiasts.

Show description

Read Online or Download An Illustrated History of the Snowdon Mountain Railway PDF

Best history_1 books

Additional resources for An Illustrated History of the Snowdon Mountain Railway

Example text

Iuscrim. 2003). D. 9, paragraphs 2 and 3. In that judgement the German Supreme Court for criminal matters held that “The Court inclines, in any case under Article 6 paragraph 9 of the German Criminal Code, not to hold as necessary these additional factual links that would warrant the exercise of jurisdiction . . ” (judgment of 21 February 2001, 3 StR 327/2000). The quotation was taken from A. Cassese, International . , op. , p. 289. Pursuant to that first article, the law in question is enforceable for crimes envisioned therein (those of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes figuring in the ICC Statute – “even when the crime is committed abroad and is not related in any way with Germany” (words in italics added).

R. ), Cooperación Jurídica Internacional, Madrid, 2001, pp. 196 and subsequent; or C. I. Torres García, “Crímenes contra la paz y seguridad de la humanidad, jurisdicción internacional y jurisdicción universal”, Revista Jurídica de Castilla-La Mancha, n. 34 (2003), pp. 182 and subsequent. 30 In their separate opinions regarding the above-mentioned judgement of 14 February 2002, the following judges came out against universal jurisdiction in absentia: Guillaume (paragraph 12), Ranjeva (paragraph 8), Rezek (paragraph 6) and Bula Bula (paragraph 40) while other judges favoured its admissibility in international law: Van Den Wijngaert (paragraph 56), Higgins, Kooijmans and Buergenthal (paragraph 56).

In accordance with the literal sense of that precept, “The Spanish jurisdiction shall also be considered competent to deal with acts committed by Spaniards or foreigners outside of national territory that can be classified in accordance with Spanish criminal law such as the following crimes: a) Genocide; b) Terrorism; c) Piracy and the illicit seizure of aircraft; d) Counterfeiting of foreign currency; e) Crimes related to prostitution and the corruption of minors or the declared unfit; f ) Illegal trafficking in illegal psychotropic, toxic and narcotic drugs; g) and other crimes that, pursuant to international treaties or conventions, should be persecuted in Spain.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.46 of 5 – based on 39 votes